August 17, 2024
The Little Season of Satan – Hidden History or Heresy?
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:00:26 — 55.0MB)
Subscribe to get new episodes every week! Apple Podcasts | Email | TuneIn | RSS | More
There is a lot of eschatological “noise” on social media and alternative news about the so-called “Little Season” of Satan, and whether or not we are currently in it.
The Little Season theory essentially states that we are in a Post-millennial period between the 1000-year Kingdon of Jesus and the Great White Throne of Judgement. Revelation chapter 20 states that after the Armageddon scenario, Satan is imprisoned for the 1000-year Millenial reign of Jesus. After which, he is released for a “little season” to gather the nations to overthrow Jesus in Jerusalem. According to this theory, we are in that season right now!
This means that the rapture, the Tribulation, Armageddon, the Second Coming of Jesus, and the 1000-year Kingdom have ALREADY HAPPENED!!
The proof point promoted by people who espouse this theory is the advanced “Tartarian” architecture that we see remnants of around the world. This apparently speaks to an advanced civilization with extraordinary technological know-how that vanished no more than a few hundred years ago. According to them, this abandoned technology proves that Jesus ruled over an advanced society in the recent past (and then He apparently just abandoned it…and us).
But does the Little Season and Tartaria fit Biblically, historically, and logically? The answer is a resounding NO! A mere cursory examination of this theory shows that it is utterly ludicrous! So why is it being promoted so vigorously? I was puzzled by this until I noticed that the promoters of this theory, tended to also hold to another long-held and equally poor eschatological theology. And the Little Season is their latest attempt to justify their bankrupt beliefs.
I break it all down in this special episode of Faith By Reason
Refuting silly escatology
I absolutely love your work and heard ya on nephilim death squad. I was always a pre or mid tribulation believer, and I really like the 3 rapture theory you put forth. My dad had a many similar takes to you, and he passed shortly before I knew about faith by reason this year. Really wish I could send him some episodes and we could debate and discuss them. Keep up the good work Ed, love the show, it’s helped me through alot (I listen to the podcast, please keep it all in one feed.)
Good afternoon. Love your work btw. Was listening to you on death squad in the little season episode. You mentioned Isaiah 11:6- the lion will lay down with the lamb.
Your words. Look up that verse. It’s the wolf will lay down with the lamb. What do you make of this change? It’s freaking me out kind of. I don’t think we all remember this verse wrong
No, I just think we transpose wolf and lamb, with lions eating straw like an ox. IF I said that on NDS, then I just mispoke. I know I specifically said wolf and lamb on my video. It’s just one of those common errors that gets picked up and repeated like “Luke, I am your father” (which Darth Vader never said), vs. “No, I am your father”, which is the actual line from the Star Wars movie.
Hello! I listened to this and I’ve got a question. For your 1st objection to Little Season Eschatology, you appealed to Revelation 6:14. This is found in the Book of Revelation, traditionally attributed to John of Patmos, rather than Jesus directly. The specific verse is:
**Revelation 6:14 (NIV):** “The sky receded like a scroll, rolling up, and every mountain and island was removed from its place.”
My question is: Why did you leave out the first half of the verse about the sky receding like a scroll? You argued we can’t be in the Little Season because it says the mountains and islands were removed, yet they’re still here. Yet, the sky is still here, too. Which, if you included the entire verse, would contradict your own Eschatology if you were to remain consistent.
You said you’re using contrastive thinking, as opposed to comparative thinking (meaning, you said you’re being humble and trying to prove your ideological opponent right, instead of trying to prove yourself right). But this argument you made is a clear contextomy fallacy, and one that must be deliberate. You can’t have “accidentally” left out the first half of the verse. You saw what it said and made a decision to leave it out because you realized that if you include it, it would invalidate the entire argument you made.
Beyond that, I heard a lot of appeal to ignorance fallacies and appeal to incredulity fallacies after that. Ex: “there’s no evidence of Jesus returning 1k+ years ago” (I’m adding “that you’re aware of” or “presented by mainstream academia”). You realize Little Season Eschatology claims that mainstream academia is purposefully trying to cover all of that up, right? So you’re just committing a circular reasoning fallacy by assuming the history taught by mainstream academia is necessarily accurate [the word of man].
I didn’t mention the sky rolling up like a scroll because I wasn’t addressing Revelation 6. I was actually referencing Revelation 16:20 where it says that all the islands fled away and mountains weren’t found. So your entire premise is incorrect (as well as all the other assumptions you made about me based on the false premise).
Speaking of fallacious arguments, I don’t have to prove that Jesus didn’t return 1K+ years ago. The burden of proof is on you little season people since you are the one’s making the claims. Now, do you have any actual, conclusive evidence that Jesus returned 1k+ years ago? If not, then my premise that there is no evidence stands.
So your only evidence for this great historical cover up is the fact that there is not evidence of it. That my friend is the very definition of circular reasoning.
The Real Person!
The Real Person!
There is evidence that our dates have been altered. Ancient coins exist that seem to be dated in the 1600s but with closer examination, the 1 in the year is actually an i or a j.
If Satan was able to do a reset of Earth after the millennium, he would have arranged to hide evidence of the millennial kingdom in multiple ways. Why were there so many insane asylums? Why is there advanced architecture of the same style around the Earth? Just check out the US state capital buildings – who built them? How did the people of the time with carts and horses build them? Why was the advanced technology (free energy) on these ancient buildings dismantled and destroyed?
Consider Satan’s influence over our entire civilization since the 1800s. It’s far more evil today that most are willing to admit. Why is that?
What if dispensationalism has been Satan’s way of getting the church generally thinking and anticipating a Mark of the Beast, Antichrist, tribulation, etc? Clever if all that was fulfilled in the first century.
Maybe Satan is hiding in plain sight and we don’t recognize his tactics of twisting the truth and outright lying.
Preterism and the Little Season concepts should be given another look. Maybe Satan is about to be taken away for good and we have a stellar eternity to look toward to.
Why is there no evidence that Jesus returned? Why is there massive documentation of the 33 years of Jesus’ first advent but NONE of His 1000 year kingdom? Why is there no evidence of the dramatic global changes of the Tribulation? Why is there enormous and vivid evidence of every earthly kingdom that has ever existed, but NONE of the supernatural Kingdom of the living God on earth? Why is Satan unable to erase 33 years of Jesus on earth which only affected an area the size of New Jersey, but he is somehow able to completely erase a WORLD-WIDE kingdom that lasted 1000 years? Is Satan more powerful than God? Why don’t any of these so called advanced tartarian structures show any connection to Jesus or the Bible? The Kingdom of Jesus is called “everlasting” in the bible, so why isn’t He still here? Why isn’t Satan doing what the Bible said he would do in the little season? Can Satan change God’s word? Why are we not experiencing ANY of the features mentioned in Isaiah and Ezekiel about the Millennium? Why do you continue to hold on to a theory about God’s plan that contradicts the Bible?