Based solely on human understanding, we’ve concluded that the nature of the First Cause is the principles of “righteousness”, and “justice”. We’ve also seen that the Judeo-Christian Bible meets the qualifications of an additional information source from, and about the First Cause (God) because it agrees with what we already know about the First Cause and it demonstrates its supernatural origin. But why would the Fist Cause want to supply this information, and to whom would it be intended?
Get to know me!
Asking these questions assumes that the First Cause is intentional, which assumes that the First Cause has a volitional will, which assumes that the First Cause is intelligent. Are these assumptions correct?
The Bible definitely presents God as intelligent (possessing knowledge and having the ability to productively apply it) and that God is intentional. This matches what we already know, because we have previously discussed the fact that information exists, and intelligence is on the causality ladder between principles (first causes) and information.
So why would an intelligent being want to provide information about his or herself? Logically, to let other intelligent beings know who he or she is. And why would the intelligent being want others to know who they are? Well, if they are just (which we know the First Cause is) then there must be some value gained both for the intelligent being in being known, and for the recipient of the information in coming to know the intelligent being.
What are the values gained? I contend that for the recipients (us) the value is the answer to question, “What’s the point?” But what value could the First Cause get from us knowing this information? The First Cause gets its greatest desire fulfilled! We’ll address that in next four posts…
In the meantime, its logical to assume that God gave us the Bible because He wants to be known by other intelligent beings (with this in mind, I could argue that God does not want most politicians and Hollywood celebrities to know Him. But that would be mean).
Is this really the best way?
But why create the Bible to get this information out? Wouldn’t it make more sense if God just parted the clouds and yelled “Hey! I’m God! Bow down and worship me you grubby little monkeys!” Actually, He did! (Granted, He didn’t say the “grubby little monkeys” line). God spoke verbally and directly to man in the past (and will do so again in the future), but men still refused to understand God or accept His answer to the question “What’s the point?” We’ll explore these interactions more in depth in upcoming posts, but for our present age, the Bible is our determined information source.
But it could mean anything, right?
Of course the point of any information source is to be understood by the intended audience. This idea often prompts some to interject the artificial objection to the Bible that I like to call “The Many Interpretations Fallacy” (aka – The Battle-Cry of the Intellectually Lazy).
Basically, the perpetrator says, “There are soooo many interpretations of the Bible, we could never be possibly sure what it really means. How do you know your interpretation is correct? Now put that Bible down, American Idol is on!”
There are indeed many interpretations of the Bible (Charles Manson has one that shows he’s Jesus), but there is only ONE correct interpretation of the Bible – the one that God intended! All other interpretations are wrong, so they are irrelevant. Our challenge is to discern that correct interpretation. This discernment is greatly aided by knowing God’s nature, will, and plan for humanity. This blog endeavors to help in this cause.
To that end, one could fairly say that based on the information in the Bible, God is much more than just the principles of “right” and “just”. Isn’t God a “person”? Doesn’t He have a personality, intelligence, feelings, desires, values, temperament, love, compassion, mercy, etc.?
Yes, he does! The Bible says God possesses all of those qualities. But remember the rules of causality – those traits are all effects of the cause. God’s “person” is an effect of being always and completely right and just.
In my next post I want to address one of God’s fundamental characteristics. The implications of this characteristic are critical in understanding an extremely important aspect of God’s identity. Next week, we’re going to discuss Love…
Remember to subscribe to this blog to receive new posts when they are published